The delay of the CLARITY Act, a proposed federal framework for stablecoin regulation, has deepened the rift between Wall Street’s $6.6 trillion stablecoin warning and the White House’s competing stance on how digital dollar-pegged assets should be governed.
Why the CLARITY delay changes the conversation
Stablecoin legislation had been expected to advance through the Senate Banking Committee this spring. Instead, crypto bill talks have stalled after major banks rejected a White House compromise proposal on stablecoin oversight.
The stall leaves the stablecoin market, which backers of the CLARITY Act sought to bring under a clear federal charter, operating without updated rules. For policy watchers tracking efforts like the BITCOIN Act and related legislative pushes, the delay signals that even bills with bipartisan momentum can lose traction when banking interests and executive branch priorities collide.
Senate Banking Committee ranking member Tim Scott issued a statement on the market structure markup, underscoring that disagreements over scope and yield provisions remain unresolved. Without a scheduled markup date, the CLARITY Act faces an indefinite timeline.
The $6.6 trillion warning from Wall Street
Large financial institutions have warned that unregulated stablecoin growth could reach $6.6 trillion in circulating supply, creating systemic risk to the traditional banking sector. The concern centers on deposit flight: if stablecoin issuers offer yield-like returns without bank-level regulation, consumer deposits could migrate out of the banking system at scale.
The White House acknowledged this tension directly. A White House research paper on the effects of stablecoin yield prohibition on bank lending examined whether banning yield on stablecoins would protect bank lending capacity or simply push activity offshore.
That research framed the debate as a tradeoff: prohibiting yield could preserve bank deposits but might stifle innovation and drive stablecoin activity to jurisdictions with looser rules. The $6.6 trillion figure represents the upper bound of what institutional analysts project the stablecoin market could reach if adoption continues on its current trajectory without federal guardrails.
Where the White House and Wall Street diverge
The core disagreement is structural. Wall Street’s position, as reflected in lobbying through groups like the Bank Policy Institute, favors strict issuer requirements that would keep stablecoin activity tethered to the existing banking framework. The BPI has argued that stablecoin issuers should face reserve and capital standards comparable to those applied to deposit-taking institutions.
The White House, by contrast, has explored a framework that would allow non-bank issuers to operate under a federal charter with lighter requirements, provided they meet reserve transparency standards. The Treasury Department’s own guidance has signaled openness to a broader issuer base, putting it at odds with the banking lobby’s preferred approach.
The CLARITY Act’s delay sharpens this split. Without legislation moving forward, neither side gets the regulatory certainty it wants. Banks cannot lock in protections against deposit competition, and stablecoin issuers cannot secure the federal legitimacy that would unlock institutional adoption.
For observers following how censorship resistance and monetary sovereignty intersect with federal policy, the standoff illustrates a familiar pattern: innovation outpacing regulation, with competing interests filling the vacuum.
The next concrete milestone is whether the Senate Banking Committee reschedules a markup before the August recess. If it does not, the CLARITY Act could slip into 2027, leaving the stablecoin market, and the tensions surrounding it, unresolved well into next year. Movement in adjacent areas like large Ethereum wallet activity will continue to underscore the scale of capital already operating outside traditional banking rails.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
